Latest Stories

Last Friday, I was pleased to host representatives from major employers in Bristol West for a roundtable discussion on barriers to employment for those with autistic spectrum disorders (ASD).

The National Autistic Society’s recent research into autistic people’s experiences of work highlights some stark inequalities. Just 16 per cent of autistic adults are in full-time employment. Furthermore, those with ASDs often experience negative treatment at work: 48 per cent of respondents reported that they’d been bullied or harassed at work.

There has been an increased awareness of the needs of those who have an autistic spectrum disorder. Yet the National Autistic Society has shown that many employers feel under-equipped to support staff, with 60 per cent of employers stating they didn’t know where to go for support and advice about employing an autistic person.

I was pleased so many large employers were able to join the discussion – many of whom had already taken great steps to recruit and support workers with ASDs. Representatives from Rolls Royce, Airbus, Bristol City Council, the University of Bristol, Network Rail, North Bristol NHS trust, Avon Fire and Rescue and Lloyds Banking Group all attended and spoke about what support their organisations put in place for autistic staff.

I was particularly pleased to work with the National Autistic Society’s Henry Barnes for the event, and to hear from a local worker on the autistic spectrum. Henry particularly emphasised that individual needs should be attended to, and that even positive myths surrounding ASDs can have the unintended effect of stereotyping and glossing over needs.

Autistic people have important skills they can contribute to a workplace, and many of the employers present shared great success stories from the processes they have put in place.

Conversations about autism and supporting autistic adults need to include employment. It was great to hear so many local employers keen to learn more about autism and how to support workers with ASDs in the workplace.

I’ll continue to campaign for Bristol to become a truly autism-friendly city, and I’m delighted that so many of Bristol’s employers are so keen to join me in achieving this goal.

Tacking the autism employment gap

Last Friday, I was pleased to host representatives from major employers in Bristol West for a roundtable discussion on barriers to employment for those with autistic spectrum disorders (ASD). The...

On Wednesday, I was in the House of Commons listening to the Chancellor deliver his budget speech. I waited and waited for the elephants in the room to be addressed: Brexit, the housing crisis, infrastructure in the West of England. I waited in vain. 

This was an opportunity to bring the country together and give hope to those who fear for the future, who are worried about Brexit, or about climate change, or about the housing crisis. It could have set out a bold vision for how the UK will rise to these challenges and to others that the mid-21st century present, such as finding better ways to value older people, or tackle mental ill-health, or build the health and social care system we need for today’s problems. It could have set out how we make the most of the knowledge, digital and creative economies; how we protect and grow our industries as the country’s relationship with our nearest neighbours changes.  

It could have set out a great future. It did not. 

As Theresa May’s fingers hover over the Article 50 button which will begin our negotiations with the 27 other EU members, Brexit is the biggest threat to our economic stability. So it was incredible that Philip Hammond barely gave it a passing thought. Businesses of all sizes in Bristol have told me how access to EU markets is essential for their trade. From the aerospace industry to the financial services sector to traders on the Gloucester Road, Bristol businesses face huge uncertainties as our future relationship with the EU is negotiated. For the Chancellor to blithely ignore this uncertainty hanging over our city’s economy is an insult. 

On housing too, mention came there none. Mayor Marvin Rees and his team at Bristol City Council are working creatively to help tackle our city’s homelessness problem, and to get more homes built in Bristol West. But the government clearly needs to take action too, and the Chancellor had absolutely nothing to say – despite the acknowledged housing crisis that is particularly affecting young people in Bristol West who face soaring house prices and growing rents.

When it came to discussing infrastructure spending, Philip Hammond was more interested in coining soundbites than getting Bristol moving. He announced extra funding for improving roads in the north and the midlands, while the West didn’t get mentioned. Bristol people have had to put up with the inconvenience and cost of work for railway electrification, followed by its postponement. We’ve had all the bother with none of the benefits, but the Chancellor ignored this. I have impressed on the government time and again that it needs to take action to help Bristol improve our infrastructure – not least to help bring down the dangerous levels of emissions which pollute our city daily. Despite this, the government once again overlooked the West of England. Bristol deserves better.

Philip Hammond did, however, find the time to break promises. Specifically, the 2015 Conservative Manifesto commitment not to raise National Insurance contributions. This was not a commitment buried in the small print. It appears on page three of the manifesto, and throughout the document.

The government plans to raise £2bn self-employed low and middle earners, at the same time as boasting about cutting tax for big corporations. This will affect many of my constituents in Bristol West. The Office for National Statistics estimates that there are 12,800 people in Bristol West who are self-employed – above the national and regional average. That figure includes freelance workers in the technology and creative sectors. It also includes taxi drivers, decorators, plumbers, hairdressers and electricians. All earning, on average, 40 per cent less than employees but now faced with having to pay more in taxes in an already uncertain economy.

Bristol thrives on the work of freelancers and the self-employed, but they do not have the same levels of rights and protections as employees. Work can be precarious, and making ends meet can be dependent on the prompt payment of invoices. If the Chancellor is going to take from Bristol’s self-employed with one hand, he should give something back with the other: statutory maternity pay for self-employed women, and statutory sick pay if you fall ill and cannot work, for example.

Then there are genuine fears over business rates among many of Bristol West’s small businesses, already under pressure with rent rises – worries not alleviated by a Chancellor more interested in making jokes than fixing our economy.

Growth has been revised down in 2018, 2019 and 2020 compared to the Autumn Statement. Average earnings have been revised down next year and every remaining year of the Parliament. Wages are still worth less today than nine years ago. Six million people now earn less than the living wage.

What’s more, there was nothing to fix the crisis in the NHS or properly fund our social care system. There was no mention of mental health at all. And our schools face continued struggles, with real-terms funding per pupil set to fall and a total budget cut of £3bn by 2020 – the worst funding cuts since the 1970s.

This could have been a budget to prepare our country for the journey ahead. To reassure Bristol West’s businesses and citizens in this time of uncertainty. To put Britain’s families, schools and hospitals on a firm financial footing. It could have been a budget to put minds at rest, and to help us look outward and fulfil our potential in the global economy.

Instead, it’s a budget that threatens the jobs, growth, and vibrancy of Bristol West. It’s a budget built on oversights and blind spots. And it’s a budget that fails to face up to the issues threatening our national economic stability.

What a missed opportunity.

A budget that fails Bristol

On Wednesday, I was in the House of Commons listening to the Chancellor deliver his budget speech. I waited and waited for the elephants in the room to be addressed:...

This morning government MPs – including the Conservative MP for Bristol North West, Charlotte Leslie – supported an exemption which could allow companies to start constructing fracking wells in national parks. 

As a Labour whip, I coordinated our response to a rule change which changes the law designed to prevent fracking in our national parks. These rules were brought in in 2014 thanks to Labour front benchers at the time, putting pressure on the then Coalition government and in a context of great public pressure.

The Petroleum Licensing (Exploration and Protection) (Landward Areas) (Amendment) (England and Wales) Regulations 2016 does not sound like the most exciting piece of legislation to discuss on a Wednesday morning. However, regulations (or statutory instruments, as they are called) like these give the Government ways to amend legislation which avoid the kind of debate in the main commons chamber that you often see on TV. It’s my job to ensure Labour MPs who are selected to scrutinise this bill in committees are fully up to speed with what the government is proposing. Especially when in this case it amounts to a dirty exemption which pushes through weakened regulations through the backdoor.

The amendment would remove prohibitions on building fracking wells in protected areas (such as national parks), provided the proposed well would contain less than 10,000 cubic metres of fluid.

Nearly half of all fracking wells in the US have a capacity of less than 10,000 cubic metres. Furthermore, the amendment doesn’t place any limit on the number of wells that can be built in a protected area. If a fracking company want to come along, and build lots of fracking wells in a National Park – each with a capacity of less than 10,000 cubic metres – then there will be no legislation in place to stop them.

My colleagues Dr Alan Whitehead MP, Maria Eagle MP, Paul Flynn MP and John Woodcock MP attempted to convince the committee to vote against the government’s amendment, with my support as Opposition Whip (that’s part of my role, to help the front bench to challenge the government when we think they have got something wrong). We successfully convinced two Tory MPs not to vote – which sent their front bench team into a quandary. Frustratingly, however, the rest of the Conservative MPs, including the MP for Bristol North West, Charlotte Leslie, voted for the regulation, leaving this loophole to stand.

I am certain that if this were to be debated by the full House of Commons there would be many MPs from all parties who would be unhappy with it – that’s why today I spent time helping our front bench team to kick off a campaign to fight this. If you have friends who live in or close to a National Park, you may want to let them know that they should lobby their MP and show they aren’t happy.

I firmly believe that the government’s enthusiasm for fracking shows they have the wrong priorities in addressing our energy challenges. In waving through this amendment, the Conservatives have refused to protect our national parks and our sites of special scientific interest. It is Labour who today have stood up for our environment, while the Conservatives were willing to sacrifice our natural heritage sites and give fracking a green light.

Tories’ dirty exemption opens door for fracking in national parks

This morning government MPs – including the Conservative MP for Bristol North West, Charlotte Leslie – supported an exemption which could allow companies to start constructing fracking wells in national...

Thangam Debbonaire is the MP for Bristol West constituency. 

If you would like to contact Thangam to arrange a meeting or discuss a problem, please email thangam.debbonaire.mp@parliament.uk . 

More Stories >

The Labour Party will place cookies on your computer to help us make this website better.

Please read this to review the updates about which cookies we use and what information we collect on our site.

To find out more about these cookies, see our privacy notice. Use of this site confirms your acceptance of these cookies.