Latest Stories

End of life care and the law concerning assisted dying are inevitably complex and emotive issues. I have read a great many letters and emails from people across my constituency. They offer differing and strongly held views and arguments, and sometimes include heartbreaking personal stories. I have also carefully considered the views of various groups such as Dignity in Dying, the Royal College of GPs and Scope.

I therefore welcome the opportunity for Parliament to debate this issue and to consider the different views that people hold. As you know, this Assisted Dying Bill would enable adults who are terminally ill to be provided, at their request, with medically supervised assistance to end their own lives.

Unfortunately I won’t be able to attend the debate in September. I was recently diagnosed with cancer and the debate takes place too soon after another of my chemotherapy sessions.

Nevertheless I would like to make it clear that, if I were able to attend, I would not be able to support this Assisted Dying Bill. I am not convinced it provides adequate legal safeguards or sufficiently considers the psychological implications for people who are already in vulnerable circumstances.

For example, I have concerns over the reliability of a prognosis that someone can be ‘reasonably expected to die within six months’, given that illnesses can affect people differently. The difficulty for doctors in estimating death in the medium term is something the Royal College of General Practitioners acknowledges. I’m also aware that mental capacity can be very variable during a terminal illness, and a period of two weeks (reducing to six days in some cases) for a patient to change their decision may not be a reliable safeguard. And I’m concerned that legalising assisted dying will alter the ethos within which medical care is provided and change, if not damage, the doctor-patient relationship.

I also believe that much more needs to be done to
improve palliative care and mental health treatment for those with terminal illnesses, so that no one should ever feel that they are suffering intolerably; to offer better support to carers; and to provide earlier and faster diagnosis of terminal conditions.

It is possible that, as I continue to weigh up evidence and arguments, I may be reassured on the concerns and reservations I have. I therefore cannot say I won’t change my mind on this complex and difficult issue in the future. But I am not at that point yet.

I will continue to reflect on the points that the hundreds of constituents who have contacted me have raised as the Bill progresses through Parliament.

Assisted Dying

End of life care and the law concerning assisted dying are inevitably complex and emotive issues. I have read a great many letters and emails from people across my constituency....

I’ve been contacted many times by people who are quite understandably concerned about the potential impact of TTIP, the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, currently being negotiated between the European Union and the United States.

People have asked what Labour’s position is on this and I want to make sure that everyone has access to clear information about the potential harm that a badly negotiated TTIP could cause and the potential far-reaching good that a well-negotiated TTIP can have. What matters is what gets agreed in the detail on several key matters. My Labour MEP colleagues work as part of the S&D group of MEPs in the European Parliament – the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats. They are working hard to make this what happens and they have had several key successes in doing so. I am in regular and close contact with Clare Moody, Labour MEP for the South West and will continue to post on the progress of TTIP.

The potential good that could come from this is that it could create good jobs with sustainable, fairly shared economic development for both partners, at the same time as setting high standards for workers’ rights and environmental protection for the first time in international trade.

The Commission negotiates on behalf of the EU, but the European Parliament must give its consent before it comes into force. That means that it is MEPs – Members of the European Parliament – who will vote on this. If you want to make your views known, make sure you contact your MEP.

Next 10 June the Parliament will state its recommendations to the Commission so that it has clear guidelines on what it should negotiate.

The potential: A PROGRESSIVE TTIP

TTIP: FAIR-TRADE TRADE DEALS

There must be no room for the destructive deregulation of European rights and standards. Instead, a fair TTIP can help to re-write the rules of international trade, with EU-US common standards becoming global standards. S&D group MEPs are working for this.

WORKERS’ RIGHTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS

Our historic achievements in terms of labour rights and environmental standards will be safeguarded and promoted. TTIP is the best chance we have to encourage the US to converge towards higher global common standards. S&D group MEPs are working for this.

SERVICES/PUBLIC SERVICES

S&D MEPs clearly and regularly say "NO" to rampant privatisation. The EU will open up only those sectors that will benefit from increased competition, development and price reduction. Labour and S&D MEPs have regularly said and will continue to say "NO" to the privatisation of vital public services, such as water and healthcare. They have had successes in this – see here.

FOOD

The S&D group wants to remove obstacles to the export of quality European products, but US hormone treated meat will not end up on European tables. S&D MEPs are standing clearly against the 'McDonaldisation' of our food. Our regional food diversities are an asset to promote and our quality standards will not be threatened by TTIP. On the contrary, they will serve as the standard for everyone else.

NO ISDS IN TTIP

The ISDS is the Investor State Dispute System which people have contacted me about, concerned that it would give private companies the right to sue governments arbitrarily. I completely understand and share these concerns.  The S&D group has clearly said and continues to say "NO" to private arbitration and corporate lawyers making decisions behind closed doors. They have had successes so far – see here. They will continue to vote against its inclusion in TTIP.  

The process is currently stalling

Some people have asked me about transparency in the process and finding out what the EU’s position is on various specific aspects. There is plenty of information published on the Europa website about the content, negotiation, proposals, positions and other aspects of the process. You can find out more here.

The negotiations have been going on for two years now and there are some aspects which are stalling – that’s partly because of the pressure that MEPs from the S&D group have put on the negotiations for ensuring the removal of the ISDS and other aspects that there has been widespread public concern regarding.

Conclusion: A chance for fair trade with environmental and workers’ rights at the heart

I support local trading and I also know how much it helps us all to trade with other nations. That’s partly because a connected world with trade as well as cultural and social links is a better world and a safer world – if we trade with each other we are much less likely to want to go to war with each other. That’s been the biggest success story of the European Union and I am keen to spread this success around the world.

It’s also because fair trade and the fair trade movement have helped lift so many people out of poverty across the world. So many of us in Bristol West will always want to buy the Fair Trade approved bananas. We also know we can’t grow bananas in Bristol! And also that the trader in the Dominican Republic who sells her or his bananas to us might also want to buy something we can make here – and they will also be able to invest their money in children’s education or local infrastructure.  

Environmental and workers’ rights campaigners the world over don’t just want the best for their own environment or workers; the goal is for everyone to be able to share in them. Having a trade deal negotiated by an EU with a strong socialist democratic voice in it is one of the most exciting ways we have ever had of being able to increase protection globally.

Trade negotiations have too often led the race to the bottom for protection of the environment, for workers’ rights and for fair deals for small and independent producers – wouldn’t it be great for us to be the generation which negotiated the highest possible standards into trade deals?

Be aware that many MEPs and unfortunately the UK’s Tory Government don’t all share our values. Please support the MEPs who are pushing for a progressive outcome and show your concerns to the MEPs who are willing to sacrifice our environmental and work protections for the advancement of private profit.

Please continue to stay in touch about this and also to contact your MEPs to ask their views and push them to stand firm on the things we all care so much about.

TTIP

I’ve been contacted many times by people who are quite understandably concerned about the potential impact of TTIP, the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, currently being negotiated between the European...

The Labour leadership contest has generated a lively debate over the direction of our party and our role in Britain’s future.

There are now 300,000 Labour Party members, the highest level in 15 years, and a further 300,000 registered and affiliated supporters. In Bristol West we have over 3,000 members and supporters, a threefold increase since the start of the year. Increased membership makes our party stronger, bringing forth new energy, ideas and insights. With a committed and active base we can make a real difference in pushing back against the Tory government’s reckless and damaging policies.

I am particularly pleased that so much of the increase in membership is due to younger people engaging in politics, many for the first time in their lives. The graph below shows the number of new members and supporters in Bristol West by age:

 

chart

 

47 percent of the total are under 35.  The rate of turnout in elections among younger people has, in the past, been worryingly low. If the Labour Party is inspiring a large number of young people to get involved in politics then that will be of huge benefit to our democratic process.

In Bristol West we have been actively campaigning all over the constituency since the election in May. We have changed our approach – no longer just asking people to vote for us but seeking their feedback on political issues, their thoughts on anything happening in their local area, and their views on what Labour’s priorities should be. We’ve had members new and old take part in these sessions and the response from people on the doorstep has been brilliant. The potential is there for Labour to be a powerful campaigning force going into next year’s local elections and beyond, and that’s a hugely exciting prospect.

As a stronger campaigning party we’re better placed to inspire hope for a better future: a future where there are enough affordable homes; where those in work do not have to live in poverty; where young people have opportunities to fulfil their aspirations; and where public services and infrastructure are adequately funded to provide for the needs of all.

But to do this, we need to be united, whatever the outcome of the leadership election. All of us in the movement stand for the same thing: a society in which collective endeavour ensures that a person’s prospects do not depend on luck or privilege. The next few years present major challenges but also unique opportunities that we should not lose sight of. Disunity and intrigue have cost Labour dearly in the past: we need to stay focused on our duty to those who are suffering at the hands of this government.

Labour's future

The Labour leadership contest has generated a lively debate over the direction of our party and our role in Britain’s future. There are now 300,000 Labour Party members, the highest...

More Stories >

The Labour Party will place cookies on your computer to help us make this website better.

Please read this to review the updates about which cookies we use and what information we collect on our site.

To find out more about these cookies, see our privacy notice. Use of this site confirms your acceptance of these cookies.